The Philadelphia Eagles celebrated their Super Bowl LIX victory with a traditional visit to the White House—but without their biggest star. Quarterback Jalen Hurts , the MVP and undisputed leader of the team, was notably absent, igniting a wave of speculation and public debate about the reasons behind his decision.
A “scheduling conflict” or a silent political statement?
The Eagles officially cited a “scheduling conflict” for Hurts’ absence, but the explanation has failed to satisfy fans and pundits. Just days earlier, Hurts was asked about attending the event while on the red carpet. His vague response—a pause and a pivot to “offseason training”—was neither a confirmation nor a denial, fueling curiosity about his intentions.
While the team celebrated with President Donald Trump, who held up a custom Eagles helmet and a “TRUMP 47” jersey—referencing his potential second term—Hurts’ nonappearance grew even more noticeable. Trump gave Hurts a moment of praise, calling him “a terrific guy and a terrific player,” but quickly shifted focus to Saquon Barkley, who joined the celebration and even traveled with Trump on Air Force One.
Subtle jabs, patriotic themes, and glaring omissions
Team owner Jeffrey Lurie posted a patriotic message after the visit, calling the day “a reminder of sacrifice, selflessness, and discipline.” While there was no direct callout, many fans interpreted this as a subtle nudge at Hurts. Social media posts from the team and the NFL were loaded with symbolism—tributes at Arlington National Cemetery, references to “core values,” and photo ops that seemed to double as statements of alignment.
Interestingly, Hurts wasn’t mentioned in any of these posts. No shout-out, no acknowledgment, despite being the franchise’s most valuable player. This silence was loud.
Supporters quickly flooded comment sections with messages like “JALEN HURTS RESPECT ————>” and “MVP on and off the field.” To them, his absence was more than just a missed event—it was a powerful act of self-expression. Others viewed it as a missed opportunity for leadership and unity.
Also Read: Jalen Hurts sparks outrage after ditching Trump White House invite, fans accuse QB of hiding political bias behind “scheduling conflict” excuse
This isn’t unfamiliar territory for the Eagles. In 2018, the team was disinvited from a White House visit over political tensions. In 2025, Jalen Hurts’ absence rekindles that fire, placing the spotlight once again on the intersection of sports, politics, and personal values.
A “scheduling conflict” or a silent political statement?
The Eagles officially cited a “scheduling conflict” for Hurts’ absence, but the explanation has failed to satisfy fans and pundits. Just days earlier, Hurts was asked about attending the event while on the red carpet. His vague response—a pause and a pivot to “offseason training”—was neither a confirmation nor a denial, fueling curiosity about his intentions.
While the team celebrated with President Donald Trump, who held up a custom Eagles helmet and a “TRUMP 47” jersey—referencing his potential second term—Hurts’ nonappearance grew even more noticeable. Trump gave Hurts a moment of praise, calling him “a terrific guy and a terrific player,” but quickly shifted focus to Saquon Barkley, who joined the celebration and even traveled with Trump on Air Force One.
Saquon Barkley is honored to celebrate his team’s Super Bowl victory at the White House.
— Jon Root (@JonnyRoot_) April 28, 2025
Jalen Hurts is not…
Barkley earned many people’s respect. Hurts has lost.
We need more athletes like Saquon & less Jalen Hurts. There’s no excuse to not visit the Trump White House. None. pic.twitter.com/NQbGqnE6Ls
Subtle jabs, patriotic themes, and glaring omissions
Team owner Jeffrey Lurie posted a patriotic message after the visit, calling the day “a reminder of sacrifice, selflessness, and discipline.” While there was no direct callout, many fans interpreted this as a subtle nudge at Hurts. Social media posts from the team and the NFL were loaded with symbolism—tributes at Arlington National Cemetery, references to “core values,” and photo ops that seemed to double as statements of alignment.
Interestingly, Hurts wasn’t mentioned in any of these posts. No shout-out, no acknowledgment, despite being the franchise’s most valuable player. This silence was loud.
Supporters quickly flooded comment sections with messages like “JALEN HURTS RESPECT ————>” and “MVP on and off the field.” To them, his absence was more than just a missed event—it was a powerful act of self-expression. Others viewed it as a missed opportunity for leadership and unity.
Also Read: Jalen Hurts sparks outrage after ditching Trump White House invite, fans accuse QB of hiding political bias behind “scheduling conflict” excuse
This isn’t unfamiliar territory for the Eagles. In 2018, the team was disinvited from a White House visit over political tensions. In 2025, Jalen Hurts’ absence rekindles that fire, placing the spotlight once again on the intersection of sports, politics, and personal values.
You may also like
"Gujarat attracted people from all over the world with its talent, hard work": Amit Shah
Indian Army responds effectively to Pakistan Army's unprovoked firing
'Ladko Ko Kyu Nahi Roka?: Nainital Cop Slaps Female Tourist From Delhi, Throws Her Phone During Heated Argument At Checkpost; Video Viral
Amid India-Pak rift, Senator Palwasha Zai Khan makes shocking remark on Ayodhya's Ram Mandir, sparks backlash
US warns Iran of consequences of supporting Houthis
